A polite way for the pharmaceutical companies to shrug their shoulders and still maintain their idea works because it doesn’t kill that many people, just don’t ask for proof other than that. To have the proof there would have to be a question and as I believe it to be no more than a marketing ploy. I mean let’s be serious; proven to help kids grow? Do kids not grow at their own speeds and have a ten-dance to shoot up at random time in random amounts of heights?
It seems to me that “Clinically” is no more than the pharmaceutical companies saying “I hope, but it doesn’t kill to many so we shouldn’t have too many lawsuits. The word “Clinically” before any others speaks volumes in my mind, but think about it. How many Doctors do you know that have reached the age of 70 or 80? They aren’t dying in “car accidents” So where are they all going?
Granted I see things a touch “Left of Center”, but something seems somewhat skewed to me. Not everything I see can be an incorrect version of events. There is no modern way to prove or disprove that I am wrong, but I do not press the issue either as I want the chaos and none can say that I played any part as I did nothing one way or the other. Inaction is an action in and of it’s own right and there is none out there that can say that I played any part as I did nothing one way or the other. Inaction is an action in and of it’s own right.
Merriam-Webster The Free Dictionary Dictionary.com Cambridge Dictionary
These are some Online Dictionary Definitions so you can compare them for yourself.